ChatRoom
New Posts
Active Threads

Please visit our sponsors:
 DoctorScripts.com
OnlinePrescriptionService.com


 

    PharmacyWatchers.com    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  General Discussion  Hop To Forums  Laws, regulations, and common practice    How do you interpret the message from the DEA?

Moderators: ~Kat, ~Shawn~, Neon, Rosie
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Administrator
Counselor
Picture of PWAdministrator
Posted
http://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/consumer_alert.htm

quote:
CONSUMER ALERT!
Buying controlled substances prescription drugs on-line may be illegal.

Web sites offering to sell prescription controlled substances directly to consumers "without a prescription" or "without requiring a doctor visit" are operating outside the requirements of the federal Controlled Substances Act.

It is illegal to purchase controlled substances, which include drugs such as narcotic pain relievers (e.g., OxyContin®, Vicodin®), sedatives (e.g., Valium®, Xanax®, Ambien®), stimulants or "diet drugs" (e.g., phentermine, phendimetrazine, Adderall®, Ritalin®), and anabolic steroids (e.g., Winstrol®, Equipoise®), unless you or your pharmacy has received a valid prescription from your doctor. A valid prescription requires a legitimate doctor-patient relationship, which in turn requires a valid medical examination, diagnosis and conclusion that the drugs prescribed are for a legitimate medical purpose. Responsible professional medical organizations, such as the American Medical Association and state boards of medicine and pharmacy, have all condemned the practice of "cyber doctors" issuing prescriptions on the basis of online questionnaires and consider it to be an unprofessional and unacceptable standard of care. The DEA and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have also concluded that obtaining prescription drugs, including controlled substances, by simply filling out a questionnaire or placing an order with a website offering such products for sale does not meet the legal requirements of a valid prescription. It is illegal for a consumer to import a controlled substance from a foreign country – and many sources of prescription drugs sold via the Internet are foreign even when not advertised as such.

Agencies such as the DEA, the FDA, and many others at the state, federal and international levels, are working to eliminate these illegal web-based pharmacy operations. However, consumers must be aware that obtaining controlled substances in violation of the law places them at risk legally, and that drugs shipped from illegally operating sites which are found in domestic and international mail/transport facilities are subject to seizure.

For more information, see the Federal Register Notice - "Guidance - Dispensing and Purchasing Controlled Substances Over the Internet"


It is very clear that they are saying that importing controlled substances is against the law.

How do you define a "legitimate doctor-patient relationship"?
What do you think they are saying about ROP's prescribing controlled substances?

Are ROP's legal or not? Why?

Your comments are most welcome. At least the message starts with "Buying controlled substances prescription drugs on-line may be illegal" and not a simple "is illegal".


-----------------------------
Please DO NOT PM the MODs and ADMINs for support! Post ALL support questions in the forums so the answers can benefit all members.

To purchase a subscription: http://pharmacywatchers.com/groupee/premium
 
Posts: 1642 | Registered: August 03, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Army, Naval and Air Attaché
Picture of Auntsee
Posted Hide Post
My take on all this is that it will take time but the dea is trying their best to scare us all into stopping purchasing online. For an OP we have legit, current records, so there is not much they can do because we DO consult with real md's. NROP's are another story. That won;t last. Eventually the only way we will be able to purchase our meds online will be to have an in-home/work doctor visit. That way it is a TRUE one-on-one relationship with a physician. They will probably charge more for that but for me it is still worth it. Does anyone elese agree with me?
 
Posts: 566 | Registered: August 17, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary
Picture of pharmboy
Posted Hide Post
I am sorry I don't have time to contribute more, and respond to your question(s) Auntsee, but I think the operative term of the DEA notice is in the title. The word "may" as in "may be illegal." It doesn't say "is illegal". I think, as before, but with a little more urgency, it is still a gray area of the law. I just hope the government and regulators can make room for OCSs that won't make it so expensive and restrictive. That grown, responsible adults have significant say in there treatment, without being restricted so much in their choices of treatment by a few in the medical profession, pharmacy profession, and law enforcement. That's the problem with one size fits all goverment solutions. Because some can be hurt or abuse, then all must be prohibited. And what is abuse and hurt? There are wide differences of opinion, but if you have a tightly regulated process, the most restrictive is usually the way things work out. The whole process is so scewed now with emotions and good intentions, that to protect the patient, we are leaving the patient out of the question more and more, offering little choice. Well, I have to go, but that's my thoughts right of the cuff.
Take care,
PB


FORE! PLAYING THROUGH!
 
Posts: 8320 | Registered: October 02, 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Persona non grata to the extreme
Senior Secretary
Posted Hide Post
it goes by state law after that and even then the enforcement of such laws is sporatic at best. An instance of this is the colonie new york thing. They arrested four people from ups hub there. The excuse is that in order to have any script you have to see a Dr face to face in New York. What if you live on border?? a conneticut Dr may be closer. They only enforce when they feel like it. Hollydolly
 
Posts: 769 | Registered: October 16, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary
Picture of Puff
Posted Hide Post
Technically, the ROP's are legal. The DEA does not say that they are illegal. The original federal law did not specifically state that the doctor-patient relationship had to include face-to-face contact (it was assumed, of course, before the internet).
-Puff
 
Posts: 2747 | Registered: June 11, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Assistant Attaché
Posted Hide Post
The DEA will state that all OPs are not legal, but they have the manpower to shut down everyone if they choose too. The ones that require records, ID and agreements will remain around for us for time to come. Keeping a low profile is always best for a good reliable OP, as they do not want to posted all over the boards. It causes more problems than positive acts, especially since many post end up becoming bad press, not so much good press.
I have found a great service that requires everything, but are always on top of everything. I do not even think their name is posted on this board, I realize now why... A smart move I guess...
Have a great day!
 
Posts: 54 | Registered: November 11, 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 

    PharmacyWatchers.com    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  General Discussion  Hop To Forums  Laws, regulations, and common practice    How do you interpret the message from the DEA?

All content belongs to PharmacyWatchers.com and may not be copyed or reproduced in any way.